On Aristotles On the Soul 1.12

On Aristotle"s on the Soul 1.1 2 (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle)

by Philoponus

• 353 Want to read
• 11 Currently reading

Published April 6, 2006 by Cornell University Press .
Written in English

Subjects:

• History & Surveys - Ancient & Classical,
• Philosophy,
• Early works to 1800,
• Early works to 1850,
• Psychology,
• Soul,
• Ziel.,
• gtt

---

Edition Notes

Contributions	Philip J. van der Eijk (Translator)
The Physical Object
Format	Hardcover
Number of Pages	232
ID Numbers
Open Library	OL7848725M
ISBN 10	0801444829
ISBN 10	9780801444821

---

  Aristotle's View of Induction: A Summary [On Induction]: “The soul is so constituted to be capable of this process.” [Aristotle, Posterior Analytics , a14] In the history of induction, Aristotle features prominently as the first person to explain what it was. 5. According to Plato, “Since the function of oratory is in fact to influence men's souls, the intending orator must know what types of soul there are (88)”. This idea of being able to read one's audience plays a prominent role in what Plato suggests is one of the most important aspects of speech and persuasion.

a. In the same book in ‘The Republic’: Soul of man has higher principles of reason (which is the essence of its being) as well as lower constituted of baser impulses and emotions. Whatever encourages and strengthens the rational principle is good, and emotional is bad. b. of soul accordingly "seems to be like a kind of ornament [kosmos] of the virtues" (al-2). There may, however, be other reasons for Aristotle's specialAuthor: Jacob Howland. The more important of these form two distinct groups preserving different traditions. a The earlier (Π) consists of EVY, the later (Φ) of LNSU. Of the other mss., M generally follows Π, while PQTWX seem more akin to Φ.Z (which is supplementary and related to E) has independent value for the De Respiratione and De Spiritu, and Ba occasionally helps in establishing the text of .

  The comments on “Liturgical translation backflip unlikely to hold” took an interesting turn – into eucharistic theology and Real Presence. One commenter stated that “transubstantiation” – which I take to be a philosophical explanation of the doctrine of the Real Presence – is not intrinsically tied to Aristotle’s philosophy. Students will have access to chapter dra#s of a book I am currently writing, entitled Desiring the Good: Ancient Proposals and Contemporary!eory. Some contemporary readings in ethics and theory of action will be recommended, either because they have shaped scholarship on Aristotle, or because they are inspired by Size: KB. “The Aristotelian Categories.” [Barnes et al., v. 3] Granger, H. “A Defense of the Traditional Position concerning Aristotle’s nonsubstantial Particulars.”.